We have been reading the TB test reults today, and when I phoned Philip at 11.00am they were moving from Nantleach to Brynllefrith with some very bad and sad news. Three of our younger cows have reacted positively to the Tb test meaning they will have to be culled.
All three are in calf, and expecting within the next few weeks. We are hoping that they will be able to stay in isolation on the farm so that they can have their calves before the cows are taken off to be culled. We will then have to raise the calves on the bucket / bottle.
It would appear that the bullock whom has already been culled who reacted at the last test probably picked it up at Nantleach, where we have never had Tb before.
I am now researching to find our all we can about TB and to see what we can do to eradicate it at this stage. I think it may well be that we can get together with neighbours because we should all be working together on common ground if we are to do this.
I have put together some snippets so that you can see what a huge problem this disease is for the farming industry.
Fourteen leading agricultural and veterinary organisations met earlier this month and agreed a controversial strategy to start killing the animals.
advertisement
The extermination will cover a vast area of the West Country, with the first cull expected to take place this summer. Organisers hope the cull can then be repeated for the next three years.
The proposed area covers Britain's best-known badgers, on the Fishleigh Estate near Okehampton, Devon, who have been watched by millions on BBC2's Springwatch series.
The Government has yet to decide whether to formally permit a cull, but Lord Rooker, the farming and animal health minister, admits that it has "no justification" to reject it.
Scientists claim badgers act as a reservoir for TB, contracting it from cattle and then reinfecting them.
Both bovine TB and the badger population are on the increase - confirmed infections have risen from 125 in 1994 to about 2,000 last year.
No one knows how many badgers there are, but some suggest the figure may now stand at 400,000 in the UK, double the 1990 estimate.
However, any attempts to cull badgers are likely to be met with fierce public opposition.
An official consultation last year attracted 47,000 responses, three times as many as a similar one on fox-hunting, with more than 95 per cent against the slaughter.
Earlier this year a report by Sir David King, the Government's chief scientific adviser, concluded killing badgers would help reduce the spread of TB in cattle.
In the report sent to ministers, Sir David called for a badger cull to be carried out by "competent operators" in areas such as the South West where there is a "high and persistent incidence" of the disease.
His report explicitly challenged the conclusions of a 10-year study, chaired by Prof John Bourne, which said culling badgers would be ineffective in controlling the spread of the disease.
That conclusion was met with fury by farmers, who point to Government inaction and say 2007 has been the worst year for bovine TB in recent times. Source(Telegraph 31.12.2007)
DEFRA has concluded.The
Independent Scientific Group on bovine tuberculosis has published its
final report today (Monday, 18 June) after nearly 10 years of investigation in to the role badgers play in spreading the disease.
The report acknowledges that badgers do play a role in perpetuating the disease amongst cattle, but that a cull would have no worthy contribution and could make the situation worse.
For more articles and comment on bovine TB see our special report page at
Bovine tuberculosis: FWi special reportFor any cull to be effective it would need to be conducted over a very large area, such as the south west peninsula, require the complete eradication of badgers from that area and sustained for a number of years, said John Bourne, chairman of the ISG.
He added that it was made clear to the group by ministers at its inception nearly 10 years ago that any policy requiring the removal of badgers from large areas of land was totally unacceptable.
In its final report the group is also been critical of the current cattle policy and of DEFRA’s ability to implement a policy based on scientific findings and advocates DEFAR base future policy on tackling the disease spread between cattle with the introduction of a tougher suite of cattle controls.
“The objective of our work, outlined in this scientific report, has been to seek scientific truth and to provide clarity on the major issues that need to be considered for gaining control of cattle TB,” Prof Bourne said.
“We believe that in this Report Ministers now have sufficiently robust and extensive evidence to enable informed policy decisions to be made. They now have the sound science they require.”
“After nearly a decade of work we believe that we have fulfilled our original aims and are now able to provide a comprehensive appreciation of the overall problem. Our findings will surprise some, and be unwelcome to others.”
He added: “Having shown that the main approach to cattle TB control should be rigorously targeted to cattle, we hope that the overwhelming scientific evidence we have provided to support this view, and the policy options we present, will enable the farming industry and government to work together in a constructive and cooperative manner to tackle this very serious disease of cattle which causes so much economic loss and hardship to cattle farmers”.
In a statement to the House of Commons on the ISG’s report DEFRA secretary
David Miliband said: “We know that the badger can play a role in maintaining disease in the areas where bovine TB is endemic.
“The Protection of Badgers Act 1992 allows the culling of badgers under licence for disease control purposes but, while the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) has been in progress, there has been a moratorium on issuing licences for culling of badgers for bovine TB. The ISG’s final report marks the end of the RBCT. We therefore need to decide next steps.
“The ISG's report summarises the results of the RBCT. These show that small scale culling can increase levels of TB in cattle. The report also says that proactive culling as practiced in the RBCT can bring benefits but only if culling is sustained over a number of years and co-ordinated.
“The ISG are not convinced that it would be practical or economical to deliver a cull in this way, leading them to conclude that badger culling could not contribute meaningfully to the control of bovine TB in Great Britain.”
The report’s conclusions came as bitter disappointment to the NFU, but were warmly welcomed by the Badger Trust.
NFU president Peter Kendall said: “I simply do not accept that the industry cannot devise a culling strategy that will reduce the reservoir of TB in badgers”, he said.
“Indeed, recent experience in Ireland, where a targeted badger culling strategy has reduced TB outbreaks in cattle by 42% in the last five years, confirms that culling can and does work, if it is carried out thoroughly and carefully.” Mr Kendall has requested an urgent meeting with DEFRA ministers to discuss future policy.
Trevor Lawson for the
Badger Trust said: “Killing badgers is like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, doing far more harm than good.
“A less brutish approach to the small role played by badgers, such as electric fencing around farm buildings, might well yield greater benefits at a fraction of the cost.”
by Andrew Watts Source (Farmers Weekly webpage)